555
submitted 1 week ago by Rindogang@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/8915892

(original article in Swedish that reported this)

Posting this because I hadn't heard about it before and I'm probably not the only Mullvad user here, so might as well.

I'm not Swedish, but going off NATOpedia, it seems like the party is basically reinventing fascism from first principles:

The party claims to stand for a "class-conscious populism" which according to party leader Markus Allard takes inspiration from marxist ideology and unites the "productive" classes of society against the "Transferiat", with the "Transferiat" being a term coined by Allard to describe the classes of society that lives off transfers that are a net negative for society such as those who, despite having an ability to work, live off social welfare benefits, as well as those who work "made-up services"[...]

The party differs from modern day left-wing parties by seeing the working class as co-dependent with people working in enterprise and business and instead sees the classes that "live off transfers", as specified, as a large economic net-negative and an obstacle for a functional society.

visible-disgust Their ideology is nonsense fake-marxist revisionism to redirect anger at capitalism and turn it against immigrants and people who need social welfare (though they do back some generally left oriented social policies, their main thing appears to be racism)

Even if you're comfortable with funding this, it still begs the question of just how trustworthy Mullvad actually is.

I guess this still beats any of the dozens of Israeli VPNs that definitely spy on you, but it's not great emilie-shrug

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] blueworld@piefed.world 18 points 1 week ago

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696800

Hi,

Mullvad has two owners, founders, and CEOs - Daniel Berntsson, and me, Fredrik Strömberg. All posts I've seen yesterday and today, including the newspaper articles, talk about Mullvad as if Daniel is the single owner, founder and CEO. It should be obvious that Daniel's private donation to a political party is not part of Mullvad's values or mission.

If you have any questions, comments or concerns you're welcome to comment on this thread, or email our customer support.

See below for the response you'll get from support:


Mullvad is a political company. We fight for freedom of speech, freedom of information and the right to privacy. These are firmly held values of the founders of Mullvad.

Mullvad protects the right for people to express things we don't agree with. We protect the right of everyone to access views we don't agree with.

We also live these values by being tolerant in our daily work. Everyone is welcome to collaborate with Mullvad if they share these narrow core values. As employees, contractors, customers, suppliers, lobbyists, campaign partners or whatever it might be. No matter what their other opinions are and no matter whether the founders or anyone else in Mullvad dislike them. The founders themselves fundamentally disagree on several important issues.

This is what allows us to advance our common causes. Being in a tolerant and intellectually open environment is also liberating and promotes truth seeking.

The more people do this, the better a place the world will be.

It should be obvious that Daniel's private donation to a political party is not part of Mullvad's values or mission, in the same way that someone's opinions on animal rights, taxes or public healthcare policy isn't.

That said, if you no longer want to be a Mullvad customer for philosophical reasons, we think it's important to honor that. In that case, reach out to support.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 week ago

scummy af with this deflection. as if anyone would want the money they paid for a service funneled to bad actors regardless of who is doing it..

[-] nevyn@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago

The reply is fence sitting/pr, it is a fair assumption that the choices of one of the co-founders has put the company into a very difficult position. I'm not a fan of the wording, not sure I would have done a better job though. After reading it, I applied for my refund yesterday, and it was approved yesterday.

I hope Daniel Berntsson is somehow removed (or does the right thing and removes himself) from the company.

It is definitely shitty to hold Mullvad accountable for this, but money paid to Mullvad has been used to fund the political party via Daniel Berntsson.

Anyone with any vpn experience should already be well aware that it is a dodgy industry, with the majority of available 'information' being transparent marketing. I wouldn't trust 95% of companies in the industry, I would like to see Mullvad come out of this the right way up.

[-] TheFermentalist@reddthat.com 14 points 1 week ago

“shitty to hold Mullvad accountable for this “ No. It’s not. Hold them accountable. Co-founder must have known that Berntsson has fascist tendencies. That’s kinda hard to hide

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 2 points 1 week ago

By all accounts, he seems to have been a fairly standard TESCREAL-adjacent high-decoupling libertarian until now, like a lot of tech founders. While some of these end up steelmanning fascism and coming to the conclusion that it’s pretty neat, it by no means follows.

[-] nevyn@slrpnk.net -2 points 1 week ago

What country do you live in? I hold you personally, and completely responsible for its actions, you know its issues and crimes.

[-] TheFermentalist@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago
[-] nevyn@slrpnk.net -1 points 1 week ago

enjoy your ai trash.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

if the company put out a fencesitting statement instead of bringing him consequences, at best they don't care

[-] nevyn@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

That assumes there is anything they can do about his actions in his personal life.

A clause in his contract that applies significant penalties if he brings the company into disrepute sounds cool, but also problematic, and may not even be a possibility, let alone a reality.

I want him gone, it may not be that simple though.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

regardless, paying for a service that pays for fascism is something that might put them in trouble if they don't deal with it.

that is if people care. that has to be a consideration these days.

[-] nevyn@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

It has already attracted negative press, some of it valid, some of it due to deliberate manipulation and idiots (op as an example of both), the effect on their reputation will not be short lived, and this issue will continuously resurface online. They still need to deal with it though, and soon.

It has already cost them business/money due to refunds ($$$ ???), and a short/medium/long term reduction in new customers.

"That is if people care" Always the issue with humanity.

People tend to be polar online, rarely fair, or decent.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

if this amounts to something remains to be seen

[-] paranoia@feddit.dk 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Well, it's not like the other founder approved his political donations. I think it's a fair enough point to make, it is a private donation, and not a company donation.

[-] JillyB@beehaw.org 20 points 1 week ago

In a privately owned company, the wishes of the owners are the wishes of the company. Especially with political actions, treating them as completely separate is just putting blinders on.

[-] paranoia@feddit.dk -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sure, but there are two owners. It's possible to start a company with someone that has different views, or ones that diverge over time. You can't really blame the other guy for his partner's opinions.

So what should they do? Liquidate the company? Should the reasonable person leave the company he built? The guy the internet doesn't like might still be ok to work with, and equally not want to leave. Should you get in trouble for your coworker's opinions?

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

a private donation with our money.

[-] TheFermentalist@reddthat.com 23 points 1 week ago

Don’t tolerate the intolerant. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

Berntsson hides his fascist tendencies behind a thin veneer of free speech.

Strömberg obviously knows his bedmate and tolerates his tendencies.

Fuck them both. Delete Mullvad (which I used until very recently)

[-] jdr@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 week ago

Don't rely on a totschlagargument to to save yourself from thinking about the complex consequences of your choices.

Even if you think Popper was right that doesn't mean you can just draw a line down the middle of humanity dividing the intolerant-because-evil and intolerant-but-only-to-other-group.

this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
555 points (89.3% liked)

Privacy

49772 readers
533 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS