575
Meta is adding ridiculous ‘rate limits’ and a soft paywall to its smart glasses (www.theverge.com)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
158 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

TL;DR: you now need to pay a $20/month "meta premium" subscription to use a 100% offline feature that runs on your own malware-ridden smartglasses.

If you don't subscribe, you can use the feature that is already included in the hardware that you already paid for 3 hours each month

The now-paywalled feature boosts the voice of the speaker in front of you, something that even low-end ANC earphones are doing now. 5 minutes of free usage per day is basically nothing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 months ago (8 children)

How fast do you walk that you need to constantly check? You can also have you phone all out instructions for the next turn.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    I'd rather just have that overlay like Google already has for walking instead of pulling out my phone every few intersections or having it loudly announce that I'm a tourist to everyone in earshot.

    Dude, you asked for examples of what people might find useful and now you're just shitting on all of them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Yeah, and the dork glasses will most definitely won't give any weird vibes.

    Anyway, on an entirely different topic, have you ever heard the term glasshole?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    Unless you're actively looking for them, the raybans aren't going to stand out as smart glasses.

    Christ, I'm not here to defend meta or the assholes walking around harassing women, I'm saying there is a potential use for AR glasses.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, there's potential use for AR glasses, but not as a consumer item for personal ownership. They fit more in industrial settings or in specialized roles. Fuck Meta.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    You seem caught up in the Meta aspect. Take them out of the equation and it's none of your business if someone else wants a hud for any number of reasons that don't invade the privacy of others.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    For me, this doesn't solve anything. This is looking for something to fit tech in.

    You can already do this with your phone, and it isn't like checking your phone whilst walking is going to kill you or someone else (unlike using your phone whilst driving).

    You can also use the sign posts around you, my city has more than enough for people walking to get where the need, or at least the rough area.

    You can also use headphones for the verbal call outs.

    Another alternative would be a smart watch. Loads have maps or bread crumb style maps.

    The real answers have been for more disability or accessibility not seeing Google maps constantly while walking.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    Big cities have started putting lighted crosswalk indicators on the ground because people are so glued to their phones they don't see them at eye level. So yes, people are stupid enough to walk into traffic while looking at a phone. Also, it is really obvious to others when you're navigating with a phone. Scammers realize you're not from the area and now you're a target because you look like a tourist.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent