▲ 1280 ▼ According to Elon Musk’s own math, the company formerly known as Twitter has lost 90% of its value and could be worth just $4 billion (finance.yahoo.com) submitted 3 years ago by bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world 236 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 56 points 3 years ago (7 children) permalink fedilink source hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Trashcan@lemmy.world 16 points 3 years ago (6 children) This is the quote: "I don't see any scenario where they're responsible for less than 10% of the value destruction, so around $4 billion." In my head, he is comparing the minimum size of ADLs value reduction to be 10% or 4 billion. 10% of 44 billion is 4,4 billion. In this comment he is not saying anything about the current value except that 10% of 44 is around 4. How else can you read it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] RekcuffuckeR@feddit.de 18 points 3 years ago (2 children) He's saying that 10% of the value reduction is 4 billion so the total value reduction is 40 billion (of the 44 billion he bought it for). But you're right, he probably meant it like you read it and just failed to express himself properly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Palerider@feddit.uk 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) Are you saying that real life "Tony Stark genius, billionaire" is a bit thick and incapable of expressing his thoughts coherently? I'm shocked I tell you. Shocked... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago Don't forget philantropist permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sovereign_13@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) You can read it as “being responsible for 10% of the [total] value destruction, equal to $4B”. So if they’re responsible for 10% of the total value loss, and that’s equivalent to $4B, then 100% of the total value lost would be $40B. Otherwise you would say “they’re responsible for destroying 10% of the value”. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Trashcan@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Right. So it's a Schroedinger's quote...😑 But thanks for pointing out what was obvious for others permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago I think you replied to the wrong comment. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Trashcan@lemmy.world 16 points 3 years ago (6 children) This is the quote: "I don't see any scenario where they're responsible for less than 10% of the value destruction, so around $4 billion." In my head, he is comparing the minimum size of ADLs value reduction to be 10% or 4 billion. 10% of 44 billion is 4,4 billion. In this comment he is not saying anything about the current value except that 10% of 44 is around 4. How else can you read it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] RekcuffuckeR@feddit.de 18 points 3 years ago (2 children) He's saying that 10% of the value reduction is 4 billion so the total value reduction is 40 billion (of the 44 billion he bought it for). But you're right, he probably meant it like you read it and just failed to express himself properly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Palerider@feddit.uk 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) Are you saying that real life "Tony Stark genius, billionaire" is a bit thick and incapable of expressing his thoughts coherently? I'm shocked I tell you. Shocked... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago Don't forget philantropist permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sovereign_13@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) You can read it as “being responsible for 10% of the [total] value destruction, equal to $4B”. So if they’re responsible for 10% of the total value loss, and that’s equivalent to $4B, then 100% of the total value lost would be $40B. Otherwise you would say “they’re responsible for destroying 10% of the value”. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Trashcan@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Right. So it's a Schroedinger's quote...😑 But thanks for pointing out what was obvious for others permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago I think you replied to the wrong comment. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RekcuffuckeR@feddit.de 18 points 3 years ago (2 children) He's saying that 10% of the value reduction is 4 billion so the total value reduction is 40 billion (of the 44 billion he bought it for). But you're right, he probably meant it like you read it and just failed to express himself properly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Palerider@feddit.uk 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) Are you saying that real life "Tony Stark genius, billionaire" is a bit thick and incapable of expressing his thoughts coherently? I'm shocked I tell you. Shocked... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago Don't forget philantropist permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Palerider@feddit.uk 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) Are you saying that real life "Tony Stark genius, billionaire" is a bit thick and incapable of expressing his thoughts coherently? I'm shocked I tell you. Shocked... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago Don't forget philantropist permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago Don't forget philantropist permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sovereign_13@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) You can read it as “being responsible for 10% of the [total] value destruction, equal to $4B”. So if they’re responsible for 10% of the total value loss, and that’s equivalent to $4B, then 100% of the total value lost would be $40B. Otherwise you would say “they’re responsible for destroying 10% of the value”. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Trashcan@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Right. So it's a Schroedinger's quote...😑 But thanks for pointing out what was obvious for others permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Trashcan@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Right. So it's a Schroedinger's quote...😑 But thanks for pointing out what was obvious for others permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago I think you replied to the wrong comment. permalink fedilink source parent