Just FYI there's a bit of a problem in dark mode (I could not even work out how to enable light mode, so maybe it's always like this?):

I think my main feedback on the article would be that the intent is not clear. There is information about data sovereignty, but there is no call to action, it doesn't really tell me why the article exists. If it's just an explainer I feel like it should tell me more clearly that it's just explaining data sovereignty. I kept waiting for the part where it would try to convince me of something but it didn't come.

Or maybe more succinctly, I didn't come away from it understanding what data sovereignty means for NZ. What are the implications of these listed facts?