view the rest of the comments
Ask Science
Ask a science question, get a science answer.
Community Rules
Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.
Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.
Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.
Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.
Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.
Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.
Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.
Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.
Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.
Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.
Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.
Rule 7: Report violations.
Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.
Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.
Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.
Rule 9: Source required for answers.
Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.
By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.
We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.
For answers to historical questions, please check out our sister community: !askhistorians@lemmy.world
Others mentioned there is a atudy showing it could be a single photon in an extreme controlled environment.
But in normal conditions, eyes chemically adjust to a reasonable sensitivity, our dynamic range is not limitless.
Eyes actually have the very quick contraction and expansion of the iris, and then that chemical tuning on top, which is why it can take some minutes to see well in strong darkness.
So taking something more realistic you would see in different cases: In a darkened hall you can make out a faint led at 40m distance, faint being about a μW, which is unusually dim for most leds you encounter. A μW might yield you 100μl (micro lumens).
xkcd puts a firefly as 600μl lumen, which is about a millionth of a dim light-bulb. That comes to the same brightness at 100m distance, which is reasonable for seeing fireflys well.
Both of these shine that light output on a sphere, which your eyes capture a small circle of, whose size is your maximally expanded pupil. Looking at wikipedia "the size of the pupil [varies] between 1.5 mm and 8 mm", which having to look at wikipedias source (thanks for nothing) tells me it is the diameter, so radius 4mm.
That equates to 2.5ppb of the total area for the 40m distant led, so 2.5 billionths. So of those 100μl, the eye receives 250fl (femto lumens).
Assuming the color averages to green, specifically 555nm green, that has 1/683 W/l. A photon has energy in Ws of c•h/555nm, which works out to 2.8 quintillion (555nm) photons per second per lumen.
250fl is 250000 quintillionths of a lumen, so we are talking 7000 photons a second.
Now in the dark you might notice your vision is quite blurry, and takes a while to pin stuff down, analogous to a longer exposure time. So to detect say blinking, you might need to wait 100 or 200ms. So maybe we can say you can comfortably see units 700 to 1400 photons in a sufficiently dark environment.