you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 months ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago*

    Exactly! You don't. Your comment seems to imply that they are either getting disproportionately high income from reselling premium steaks (i.e. "not feeding world hunger" = only one person benefits from a large sum of money), or that that the income is very low (i.e. "not feeding world hunger" = you're not making enough money to feed yourself), but the latter doesn't make sense because any positive non-zero amount of money will get you more food than zero money. I don't know if I'm missing another interpretation.

  • source
  • parent