678
Flock Leaked Cops’ License Plate Searches via DuckDuckGo, Bing (www.404media.co)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
47 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Flock, the automatic license plate reader (ALPR) company, exposed some of the license plate cops were looking for and the reason for doing so.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Any "license plate reader" has a camera and can be used for anything. This was true before flock.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago

    I didn't know "any license plate reader" also scanned your phone as you went by and added your dog to their database to better identify you as an individual.

    They don’t just read license plates. They analyze faces/pets/distinctive clothing to ID people, scan nearby WiFi and Bluetooth signals to track devices, scan distinctive features of vehicles (dents, scratches, bumper stickers, etc) to track them even without a clear license plate, etc… Calling it a license plate reader vastly downplays their capabilities.

    It’s like someone calling a fully automatic high-powered machine gun “a rabbit-hunting gun”. Sure it could be used to shoot rabbits, but that’s vastly understating the capabilities.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    'Can be' and 'are' are two completely different categories of things.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    You think USA government agencies never thought of using public surveillance cameras to spy on people before now? That's like basic stuff for any domestic security agency, in any country. The only difference is that now the data is shared with regular police with all the incompetence and abuse it implies. You have always been spied on.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago*

    You think USA government agencies never thought of using public surveillance cameras to spy on people before now?

    No. I do not.

    I think allowing a private company access to that kind of data, without any meaningful restrictions on what they can do with it, is a lot different than the current situation of 'spy agencies can spy for the government'.

    If I'm a bad guy and I can get access to a Flock (or Palantir, fed by Flock) subscription then I can do bad guy things a lot more effectively. Can you think of any bad guys who could afford such a subscription?

    Who owns that data and what rules it falls under is important. The government needs a warrant to obtain cell-site location tracking data, but Flock can sell a subscription to obtain that same data to anybody who can clear an ACH transfer.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent