211
Nvidia’s CEO Jensen Huang says electricians and plumbers will be needed by the hundreds of thousands in the new working world (fortune.com)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
106 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 3 months ago (7 children)

I wonder how long it will take for shareholders to experiment with replacing CEOs with agentic AIs. They'd certainly be good at spouting crap like Jensen is doing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Point of a CEO is that there's one public person for everyone to hate that can be given an even more hated golden parachute if shit goes down. You can't do this with AI. Replacing AI with AI doesn't have the same effect on people even if it has the same effect in reality

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (5 children)

    You don't want to replace them as that has legal issues. But an AI being backseat driver and evaluating their decisions and check what the consequences would be to report that to investors is also very useful.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (4 children)

    Don't antropomorphize AI!

    An AI doesn't evaluate anything, an AI doesn't check for consequences. All AI does is predicting the next word.

    Do I take the car to the carwash or do i walk?

    If it's only 300m away, you should walk

    Sure, now predict the future please *facepalm*

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (3 children)

    The carwash thing applies to low end models and older models. Here's Claude from lowest to highest model, ignoring the banned Fable

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    They altered the training data to address this challenge. The underlying issue wasn't solved in any way. Don't be naive.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    Takes months to train a model, there were already models that got it right when the question was popular, as long as thinking was enabled.

    Also if they were optimising for this question, why not update their lower end model (Haiku) as well?

    The interesting question would be what percent of humans get it wrong. Smaller than LLMs for sure, but I somehow doubt it's 0.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •