▲ 449 ▼ Trump admin abandons fight against wind energy as clean energy output surges (arstechnica.com) submitted 2 months ago by Some_Emo_Chick@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 71 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (6 children) Laws? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (5 children) There are far too many laws already on the books now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (4 children) True, but that doesn't change the fact that laws are what "gives them the right". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (3 children) Immoral laws should not exist, and when they do they should not be followed. Any laws without an actual victim are immoral laws. Therefore any law that says I can't build something out in the middle of nowhere, on land I own, with no neighbors within a mile of me where no other land owners could conceivably be affected is itself also an immoral law. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Also true but it doesnt change anything. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 child) Not with that attitude it doesn't. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I wasn't trying to change anything, I was just answering your question about where the right of the government to set limits on what you can do with your land comes from. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (5 children) There are far too many laws already on the books now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (4 children) True, but that doesn't change the fact that laws are what "gives them the right". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (3 children) Immoral laws should not exist, and when they do they should not be followed. Any laws without an actual victim are immoral laws. Therefore any law that says I can't build something out in the middle of nowhere, on land I own, with no neighbors within a mile of me where no other land owners could conceivably be affected is itself also an immoral law. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Also true but it doesnt change anything. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 child) Not with that attitude it doesn't. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I wasn't trying to change anything, I was just answering your question about where the right of the government to set limits on what you can do with your land comes from. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (4 children) True, but that doesn't change the fact that laws are what "gives them the right". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (3 children) Immoral laws should not exist, and when they do they should not be followed. Any laws without an actual victim are immoral laws. Therefore any law that says I can't build something out in the middle of nowhere, on land I own, with no neighbors within a mile of me where no other land owners could conceivably be affected is itself also an immoral law. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Also true but it doesnt change anything. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 child) Not with that attitude it doesn't. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I wasn't trying to change anything, I was just answering your question about where the right of the government to set limits on what you can do with your land comes from. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (3 children) Immoral laws should not exist, and when they do they should not be followed. Any laws without an actual victim are immoral laws. Therefore any law that says I can't build something out in the middle of nowhere, on land I own, with no neighbors within a mile of me where no other land owners could conceivably be affected is itself also an immoral law. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Also true but it doesnt change anything. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 child) Not with that attitude it doesn't. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I wasn't trying to change anything, I was just answering your question about where the right of the government to set limits on what you can do with your land comes from. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Also true but it doesnt change anything. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 child) Not with that attitude it doesn't. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I wasn't trying to change anything, I was just answering your question about where the right of the government to set limits on what you can do with your land comes from. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 child) Not with that attitude it doesn't. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I wasn't trying to change anything, I was just answering your question about where the right of the government to set limits on what you can do with your land comes from. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I wasn't trying to change anything, I was just answering your question about where the right of the government to set limits on what you can do with your land comes from. permalink fedilink source parent