236
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
236 points (100.0% liked)
Anarchism
3150 readers
3 users here now
Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.
Other anarchist comms
- !anarchism@slrpnk.net
- !anarchism@lemmy.blahaj.zone
- !anarchism@hexbear.net
- !anarchism@lemmy.ml
- !anarchism101@lemmy.ca
- !flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Let me get this straight: it's cool to demand Buddy cam footage of cops killing humans, but not animals? Is that what you're saying? Because people can just like...not watch it. Just like they could not watch footage of any humans we've been seeing released.
Hands up, don't shoot! I can't breathe! No kings!
Huh?
Do you have a reading comprehension problem or are you just inventing something completely different to what I said to get mad about and then slapping a bunch of slogans on the end (one of which is just liberal) like it adds something?
What is wrong with you? I'm not mad but you seem to have issues.
Nice ad hominem. Obviously the cops are saying the animal rushed them. Body cam will clear it up.
Hi I want to apologize for yesterday. I was tired, sore, grumpy and misread your intent. If you don't want to accept, I understand, I just wanted to say I'm sorry, anyway.
Wishing you well. ❤️🩹
You're taking the person you are replying to too literally. They were just saying that the dog is obviously a big sweet goofball by look and breed alone. They weren't saying that the cam footage literally should not be reviewed.
I mean I've seen fluffballs that will eat your face and rotts, dobies, and pits that think they're lapdogs. But yes, tone doesn't always convey over the internet.
???