▲ 805 ▼ average physics student vs POTUS 47 (thelemmy.club) submitted 3 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 122 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago (2 children) That's knowing how to use it, not how it works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago (1 child) No, the theory of electromagnetism and by extension physics in general is knowing how it works. How to use it is engineering, a different set of knowledge which we also have some of. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago I think they mean more the difference between what rules it follows and why it follows those rules. It sounds like we know more about the "what" but not much about the "why" for magnets (or any of the fundamental forces). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago (1 child) No, the theory of electromagnetism and by extension physics in general is knowing how it works. How to use it is engineering, a different set of knowledge which we also have some of. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago I think they mean more the difference between what rules it follows and why it follows those rules. It sounds like we know more about the "what" but not much about the "why" for magnets (or any of the fundamental forces). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago I think they mean more the difference between what rules it follows and why it follows those rules. It sounds like we know more about the "what" but not much about the "why" for magnets (or any of the fundamental forces). permalink fedilink source parent