266
Rsync author responds to online outrage about his usage of LLMs (medium.com)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/programming@programming.dev
238 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Seems like he's been pushed into using LLMs as a way to cope with the deluge of LLM-generated security reports.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Any specific issues though? Yeah, it's a large change and I'd be more surprised if it didn't have issues, but are there any specific issues with the updates that have been found so far?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    Yes, there’s been several regressions that would’ve been caught by the original tests, but missed by the new vibe-coded tests.

    That is directly contradicted by what the developer of rsync wrote in the linked article:

    yes, there were regressions in some use cases of rsync in the 3.4.3 release. ... None of those cases were covered by the existing rsync test suite or by all the manual testing I did (yes, I use rsync, I don’t just develop it).

    It's possible that somebody in the issue you linked to pointed to a test that would have caught one of the regressions, but I was not able to find it in the 327 comment mess. A direct link would be appreciated, if that is the case.

    But I doubt that you will find such a comment. Because I tried running the 3.4.1 test-suite with the 3.4.3 binary, and all tests passed

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •