▲ 1435 ▼ DuckDuckGo installs are up 30% as users reject being ‘force-fed’ Google’s AI Search (techcrunch.com) submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world 242 comments fedilink hide all child comments EDIIT : Apparently, there is an issue with the warning request to disable the ad blocker I use Fennec F-Droid and Cromite, and I don't see this issue. to get around the adblocker warning, use this link. https://unwall.app/techcrunch.com/2026/05/26/duckduckgo-installs-are-up-30-as-users-reject-being-force-fed-googles-ai-search/
[–] Yliaster@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago (4 children) Think microslop doesn't track you? Think again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sockenklaus@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 months ago (3 children) I'm not sure if I correctly get your point: DDG provides search results based on Bing and has advertisment contracts with MS but DDG in itself doesn't track you: From DDGs FAQ: We partner with many different information sources to deliver DuckDuckGo Search (e.g., Microsoft for ads, Apple for maps, etc.). When you view search results (including ads), your searches cannot be tied back to you, either by us or our partners. How this works technically is we do not store any personal identifiers (e.g., IP address) with your search terms, and we also proxy all requests to partners through us. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Yliaster@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (2 children) Rule of thumb is to not take their word as gospel. All social media also present themselves as being concerned about your privacy when they are anything but. Search engine ad set-ups include trackers typically. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sockenklaus@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) Okay, I get it. So do you propose that we simply don't trust any company, or do you especially mistrust DDG? If you specifically mistrust DDG, do you have a good alternative? If you mistrust companies in general: I get where you're coming from, but I also think it's highly impractical to distrust basically everyone on the Internet because you have to use their services at some point. I wouldn't use DDG's Android app, though, because it doesn't block Microsoft trackers. Now we can debate whether this means the app doesn't block MS trackers on MS websites or if it allows tracking on its own website (which would contradict the claim I cited above). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Yliaster@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago My proposition is to avoid making it seem that a provider is trustworthy when it isn't. Trusting a provider because you have to use one (and not because they are actually trustworthy) doesn't seem appropriate. Either use it while knowing they're not trustworthy, or don't. There's a lack of good options right now to my knowledge. It seems that startpage may be a viable option, although I've heard it pulls from Google's search results. Though if it doesn't have Google's trackers I would still see that as a better option. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sockenklaus@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 months ago (3 children) I'm not sure if I correctly get your point: DDG provides search results based on Bing and has advertisment contracts with MS but DDG in itself doesn't track you: From DDGs FAQ: We partner with many different information sources to deliver DuckDuckGo Search (e.g., Microsoft for ads, Apple for maps, etc.). When you view search results (including ads), your searches cannot be tied back to you, either by us or our partners. How this works technically is we do not store any personal identifiers (e.g., IP address) with your search terms, and we also proxy all requests to partners through us. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Yliaster@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (2 children) Rule of thumb is to not take their word as gospel. All social media also present themselves as being concerned about your privacy when they are anything but. Search engine ad set-ups include trackers typically. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sockenklaus@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) Okay, I get it. So do you propose that we simply don't trust any company, or do you especially mistrust DDG? If you specifically mistrust DDG, do you have a good alternative? If you mistrust companies in general: I get where you're coming from, but I also think it's highly impractical to distrust basically everyone on the Internet because you have to use their services at some point. I wouldn't use DDG's Android app, though, because it doesn't block Microsoft trackers. Now we can debate whether this means the app doesn't block MS trackers on MS websites or if it allows tracking on its own website (which would contradict the claim I cited above). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Yliaster@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago My proposition is to avoid making it seem that a provider is trustworthy when it isn't. Trusting a provider because you have to use one (and not because they are actually trustworthy) doesn't seem appropriate. Either use it while knowing they're not trustworthy, or don't. There's a lack of good options right now to my knowledge. It seems that startpage may be a viable option, although I've heard it pulls from Google's search results. Though if it doesn't have Google's trackers I would still see that as a better option. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Yliaster@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (2 children) Rule of thumb is to not take their word as gospel. All social media also present themselves as being concerned about your privacy when they are anything but. Search engine ad set-ups include trackers typically. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sockenklaus@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) Okay, I get it. So do you propose that we simply don't trust any company, or do you especially mistrust DDG? If you specifically mistrust DDG, do you have a good alternative? If you mistrust companies in general: I get where you're coming from, but I also think it's highly impractical to distrust basically everyone on the Internet because you have to use their services at some point. I wouldn't use DDG's Android app, though, because it doesn't block Microsoft trackers. Now we can debate whether this means the app doesn't block MS trackers on MS websites or if it allows tracking on its own website (which would contradict the claim I cited above). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Yliaster@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago My proposition is to avoid making it seem that a provider is trustworthy when it isn't. Trusting a provider because you have to use one (and not because they are actually trustworthy) doesn't seem appropriate. Either use it while knowing they're not trustworthy, or don't. There's a lack of good options right now to my knowledge. It seems that startpage may be a viable option, although I've heard it pulls from Google's search results. Though if it doesn't have Google's trackers I would still see that as a better option. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sockenklaus@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) Okay, I get it. So do you propose that we simply don't trust any company, or do you especially mistrust DDG? If you specifically mistrust DDG, do you have a good alternative? If you mistrust companies in general: I get where you're coming from, but I also think it's highly impractical to distrust basically everyone on the Internet because you have to use their services at some point. I wouldn't use DDG's Android app, though, because it doesn't block Microsoft trackers. Now we can debate whether this means the app doesn't block MS trackers on MS websites or if it allows tracking on its own website (which would contradict the claim I cited above). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Yliaster@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago My proposition is to avoid making it seem that a provider is trustworthy when it isn't. Trusting a provider because you have to use one (and not because they are actually trustworthy) doesn't seem appropriate. Either use it while knowing they're not trustworthy, or don't. There's a lack of good options right now to my knowledge. It seems that startpage may be a viable option, although I've heard it pulls from Google's search results. Though if it doesn't have Google's trackers I would still see that as a better option. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Yliaster@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago My proposition is to avoid making it seem that a provider is trustworthy when it isn't. Trusting a provider because you have to use one (and not because they are actually trustworthy) doesn't seem appropriate. Either use it while knowing they're not trustworthy, or don't. There's a lack of good options right now to my knowledge. It seems that startpage may be a viable option, although I've heard it pulls from Google's search results. Though if it doesn't have Google's trackers I would still see that as a better option. permalink fedilink source parent