▲ 921 ▼ Microsoft's GitHub bans security researcher who posted zero-day Windows exploits because company 'ruined their life' — expert claims action is vindictive and promises further retaliation (www.tomshardware.com) submitted 3 months ago by throws_lemy@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 134 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 43 points 3 months ago* (1 child) Is this the bitlocker backdoor? That's not an exploit / zeroday Thats making a backdoor be known. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] freely1333@reddthat.com 24 points 3 months ago (1 child) Well the thing is it’s now been zero days since they had to write a new backdoor. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* They don't need to write a new one, they probably already have more than one built and deployed for the same thing. But it's a good idea to get started on another one, so I'm really just complaining about the word 'had' as if it was a requirement. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] freely1333@reddthat.com 24 points 3 months ago (1 child) Well the thing is it’s now been zero days since they had to write a new backdoor. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* They don't need to write a new one, they probably already have more than one built and deployed for the same thing. But it's a good idea to get started on another one, so I'm really just complaining about the word 'had' as if it was a requirement. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* They don't need to write a new one, they probably already have more than one built and deployed for the same thing. But it's a good idea to get started on another one, so I'm really just complaining about the word 'had' as if it was a requirement. permalink fedilink source parent