45
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
45 points (90.9% liked)
Anarchism
3065 readers
229 users here now
Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.
Other anarchist comms
- !anarchism@slrpnk.net
- !anarchism@lemmy.blahaj.zone
- !anarchism@hexbear.net
- !anarchism@lemmy.ml
- !anarchism101@lemmy.ca
- !flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS



Making those fuels request lots of energy (at least the energy that goes out), so unless that energy is produced with renewable resources, the CO2 footprint might actually be higher (as processes aren't 100% effective, making fuel takes more energy than the fuel has).
only possible way to make it worse is with space mining and manufacturers, but we're too far away from that.
Yeah thats true too, and... thats a lot of math to do, to try and estimate that.
And also yep, might make more sense if we actually had some kind of asteroid refining ability... but we do not.
Even if we did, it is much countless times easier not to fuck up the globe than having to rely on star Trek level technology to not go extinct.