you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -19 points 3 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 29 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Our key finding is that by injecting information through an external synthetic data verifier, whether a human or a better model, synthetic retraining will not cause model collapse.

    Yeah if you have a source of truth then your model is basically getting trained on that.

    It’s like already having the answer

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago*

    Our key finding is that by injecting information through an external synthetic data verifier, whether a human or a better model, synthetic retraining will not cause model collapse.

    Lol, so to make a great model, they just need to have an even better one available first or a human who can verify every single thing it ingests.

    Hmm, call me skeptical on this claim.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago

    This assumes everything is valid on the external. If one slop cluster feeds off another - a slopveyor? - then there is nothing external for the validation hall-monitor to compare against. They're trusting another model's output as if it were gospel.

  • source
  • parent