▲ 1708 ▼ whyyyy, that doesn't make any sense... (feddit.de) submitted 3 years ago by sexy_peach@feddit.de to c/memes@lemmy.ml 99 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 3 years ago (4 children) Authoritarianism is the real cancer upon society permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Isoprenoid@programming.dev -14 points 3 years ago (3 children) It's not the '-isms', my guy. It's people. Flawed beings making and interacting with flawed systems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 3 years ago (2 children) It takes people to enact policies around the -isms and to make the -isms themselves, so I dont really see the logic here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) It takes people to enact policies around the -isms and to make the -isms themselves The OP said "...-ism is the real cancer upon society". I was pointing out that people are the real cancer of society. It doesn't matter what "-ism" you want to stand behind, there will always be issues because humanity is fundamentally broken. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 years ago humanity is fundamentally broken I'd argue that humanity and an -ism aren't that different in this context -- arbitrary linguistic form aside, they both refer to abstract collectives. But ultimately, I still don't see the logic in separating humanity from the systems it created and uses. Fixing one fixes the other, in bilateral fashion. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Isoprenoid@programming.dev -14 points 3 years ago (3 children) It's not the '-isms', my guy. It's people. Flawed beings making and interacting with flawed systems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 3 years ago (2 children) It takes people to enact policies around the -isms and to make the -isms themselves, so I dont really see the logic here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) It takes people to enact policies around the -isms and to make the -isms themselves The OP said "...-ism is the real cancer upon society". I was pointing out that people are the real cancer of society. It doesn't matter what "-ism" you want to stand behind, there will always be issues because humanity is fundamentally broken. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 years ago humanity is fundamentally broken I'd argue that humanity and an -ism aren't that different in this context -- arbitrary linguistic form aside, they both refer to abstract collectives. But ultimately, I still don't see the logic in separating humanity from the systems it created and uses. Fixing one fixes the other, in bilateral fashion. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 3 years ago (2 children) It takes people to enact policies around the -isms and to make the -isms themselves, so I dont really see the logic here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) It takes people to enact policies around the -isms and to make the -isms themselves The OP said "...-ism is the real cancer upon society". I was pointing out that people are the real cancer of society. It doesn't matter what "-ism" you want to stand behind, there will always be issues because humanity is fundamentally broken. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 years ago humanity is fundamentally broken I'd argue that humanity and an -ism aren't that different in this context -- arbitrary linguistic form aside, they both refer to abstract collectives. But ultimately, I still don't see the logic in separating humanity from the systems it created and uses. Fixing one fixes the other, in bilateral fashion. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) It takes people to enact policies around the -isms and to make the -isms themselves The OP said "...-ism is the real cancer upon society". I was pointing out that people are the real cancer of society. It doesn't matter what "-ism" you want to stand behind, there will always be issues because humanity is fundamentally broken. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 years ago humanity is fundamentally broken I'd argue that humanity and an -ism aren't that different in this context -- arbitrary linguistic form aside, they both refer to abstract collectives. But ultimately, I still don't see the logic in separating humanity from the systems it created and uses. Fixing one fixes the other, in bilateral fashion. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 years ago humanity is fundamentally broken I'd argue that humanity and an -ism aren't that different in this context -- arbitrary linguistic form aside, they both refer to abstract collectives. But ultimately, I still don't see the logic in separating humanity from the systems it created and uses. Fixing one fixes the other, in bilateral fashion. permalink fedilink source parent