you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 3 years ago (2 children)

Neat!

I am a bit disappointed that these are going to be explicitly non-canon, though.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 12 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I refuse to accept that, and will only ever refer to the very Short Treks when debating the finer points of Star Trek.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I'm tempted to go back to Reddit just to make a nitpicky Redditor's head explode with this:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Sadly not, they're confirmed to not be canon. You'll have to settle for (butt)headcanon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    I expect that the Very Short Treks won't be entirely non-canon. For instance, some episode might introduce an event, place, or technology that is actually canon even if the events of the episode itself are not canon.

    Alternatively, they could be loosely canon in the same way as the Lego Star Wars shows/games, with the rough events and plots being canon even if exact details are not.

  • source
  • parent