476
submitted 3 weeks ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/socialism@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 30 points 3 weeks ago

In general, I'd argue the correct way to look at this would be from class interest perspective. What it really comes down to is whether your labor is the primary source of your income or whether it is your capital. If you're in the former category then you're a worker and you have common interest with other workers. If you're in the latter then your interests are directly opposed to those of the working class.

[-] Sedan@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Greetings, Comrade!

I would also like to offer a slight clarification: not "oligarchs," but the bourgeoisie; not "workers," but the proletariat. That is, if we are following Lenin.

Do not forget that, under a capitalist system, the proletariat consists not only of workers and peasants but also of the intelligentsia—doctors, teachers, researchers, engineers, and the like.

The middle class, too, is for the most part part of the proletariat.

The bourgeoisie, meanwhile, enriches itself through "surplus value." Were it not for this surplus value, then—firstly—all goods would be twice a scheaper, and—secondly—all global financial institutions would be abolished as unnecessary.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 weeks ago

Greetings, and agreed on all points.

load more comments (70 replies)
load more comments (148 replies)
this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
476 points (99.2% liked)

Socialism

6803 readers
3 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS