▲ 692 ▼ AI data centers face increasing complaints about inaudible but 'felt' infrasound — citizens complain high- and low-frequency sounds do not register on decibel meters but cause adverse health effects (www.tomshardware.com) submitted 4 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world 144 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 26 points 4 months ago (4 children) Just because there was a lawsuit doesn't make it true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 months ago That's right. Even if the person won the lawsuit it doesn't mean the science is true. It's one really frustrating thing about the legal system, sometimes people win lawsuits based on absolutely terrible BS science. A persuasive lawyer has to convince a jury that something is true, not convince a scientist who knows about that field. permalink fedilink source parent [+] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works -9 points 4 months ago (2 children) just because one thing turned out not to be true, it doens't automatically mean you don't have to believe any other claims. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 18 points 4 months ago (1 child) A lawsuit being filed doesn't equal scientific or medical fact. You can file a lawsuit for literally anything. Without concrete, peer reviewed studies, windmills causing health issues is just as believable as wifi causing health issues. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago yeah I was kinda implying that the people filing the lawsuits were on all that business, just didn't feel like spelling out the vague details I remember from a newspiece a year or so ago, permalink fedilink source parent
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 months ago That's right. Even if the person won the lawsuit it doesn't mean the science is true. It's one really frustrating thing about the legal system, sometimes people win lawsuits based on absolutely terrible BS science. A persuasive lawyer has to convince a jury that something is true, not convince a scientist who knows about that field. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works -9 points 4 months ago (2 children) just because one thing turned out not to be true, it doens't automatically mean you don't have to believe any other claims. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 18 points 4 months ago (1 child) A lawsuit being filed doesn't equal scientific or medical fact. You can file a lawsuit for literally anything. Without concrete, peer reviewed studies, windmills causing health issues is just as believable as wifi causing health issues. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago yeah I was kinda implying that the people filing the lawsuits were on all that business, just didn't feel like spelling out the vague details I remember from a newspiece a year or so ago, permalink fedilink source parent
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 18 points 4 months ago (1 child) A lawsuit being filed doesn't equal scientific or medical fact. You can file a lawsuit for literally anything. Without concrete, peer reviewed studies, windmills causing health issues is just as believable as wifi causing health issues. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago yeah I was kinda implying that the people filing the lawsuits were on all that business, just didn't feel like spelling out the vague details I remember from a newspiece a year or so ago, permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago yeah I was kinda implying that the people filing the lawsuits were on all that business, just didn't feel like spelling out the vague details I remember from a newspiece a year or so ago, permalink fedilink source parent