76
What We Lost the Last Time Code Got Cheap (www.poppastring.com)
submitted 5 months ago by to c/programming@programming.dev
65 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 5 months ago* (7 children)

All the studies I've found so far seem to disagree, so why should we believe you?

https://www.anthropic.com/research/AI-assistance-coding-skills (2026 study)

We found that using AI assistance led to a statistically significant decrease in mastery.

Using AI sped up the task slightly, but this didn’t reach the threshold of statistical significance.

https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/new-findings-ai-coding-overhyped (2025 study)

But those claims appear to be massively overblown, as The Register reports, with researchers finding that productivity gains are modest at best — and at worst, that AI can actually slow down human developers.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    That's what I'm saying. Ai does not help with speed. Takes potentially even longer. It helps with concept and design quality and completeness. For coding its just fancy auto complete. Think how LLMs can be used to improve the process instead of replacing yourself. Apply your skill with a lever instead.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago* (5 children)

    AIs are (apparently) stupid and fail at non-trivial tasks. They also enjoy deleting production databases. They seem atrocious with any sort of quality.

    What would AI possibly be useful for, if you care about quality work?

    (I suppose they can sometimes help with vulnerability scanning and writing mindless e-mails if you're some sort of overworked customr agent, but those are pretty narrow uses. And I'm not going to upload my stuff to big tech data sloppers myself just for some slightly better vulnerability scanning.)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (4 children)

    Again I do not suggest giving AI control. Don't let it edit your code. Just give it what it needs to know to discuss and help construct code to review and insert by hand. You have full control and enjoy the benefits LLMs bring. Everything else is just asking for trouble.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago* (3 children)

    That's the thing, I don't think LLMs bring many benefits. Too many lies, and so on.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    I think most people are too trusting and have a political agenda to hate AI for all the obvious reasons. But it solves a few very central problems for me reasonably well and people don't get to decide what I spend my money on. AI is neither the miracle dream future not the word ending scam people make it out to be. Using a tool still takes skill and angrily screaming people down (not you) won't change that AI is here to stay. I don't like calling it AI, for all the reasons. But deep learning and LLMs are a useful technology in many regards. No doubt about it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •