87
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

Pretty ironic the author used AI to write a slop article about how no one wants to see anyone else's AI slop....

Completely and utterly unaware that she's still flinging AI slop and people feel the same about hers that she feels about everyone else's.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

Why do you think so? I'm not seeing anything that immediately screams "AI wrote this," but I'm open to learning.

[-] Carnelian@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

Well, one of the first linked articles is them talking about how much they love using it and how fun it is and how everyone should be using it

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, that doesn't mean they had an LLM write their article(s). There's no shortage of people who praise AI, and they don't need an LLM to do it. That's a pretty weak connection.

I may not agree with their stance on AI at all, and I think it's fundamentally flawed, but I'm not going to accuse someone of outsourcing their writing when all we've got is "but they like AI, tho."

[-] Carnelian@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Why omit “using” from your summary at the end there? They wrote a whole article about how they love using AI and think anyone who doesn’t is comparatively unproductive. In fact they have over a dozen articles about adjacent AI topics. It’s not really a weak connection at all it’s literally just them saying they do the thing lol

Regardless, the blog itself actually has an AI disclosure: “I use AI heavily on this blog”. Followed by another article about how it is used “correctly” in this case. If you’re just in the mood to argue or whatever I guess we can debate the specific definitions and nuances between literally just copying a whole article from AI output (which they emphatically say they do not do) vs passing your writing through AI to assist you throughout the process

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 6 points 2 weeks ago

I wasn't actually trying to argue. I wanted to get to the bottom of why OP felt it was AI slop. This was and is an earnest question, because if y'all are seeing something, I'd like to know what that is, so I can stay attuned to the various tricks people use to hide when an LLM is speaking for them.

[-] Carnelian@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Gotcha, yeah I can appreciate insisting on higher evidentiary standards

this post was submitted on 08 May 2026
87 points (92.2% liked)

Technology

84858 readers
4937 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS