you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 30 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Seems likely at this moment that Motorola phones will run GrapheneOS be right out the gate as it is a partnership. Just hopefully it’s not a one sided partnership and Motorola doesn’t strong arm the GrapheneOS people into something that is more locked away and just works like an app. https://www.digitaltrends.com/phones/motorola-plans-to-put-grapheneos-on-phones-so-why-is-it-a-big-deal/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    From the outside, this doesn't look one sided to me and Motorola (Lenovo) won't want GrapheneOS "locked away".

    Motorola partnered with GrapheneOS explicitly because they want the highest security for their enterprise phones (in my opinion), so Motorola demanding GrapheneOS be less secure would be silly for them anyways since they prioritise enterprise (as far as I know).

    And in any case, if Motorola caused beef with the GrapheneOS team, I believe in GrapheneOS's morals to ignore stupidity. They probably have a contract anyways that states Motorola have near zero influence over the OS.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Lenovo running the show is what makes it viable, otherwise I would have thought it was a Google backed conspiracy to drain GrapheneOS resources on a product that would never release.

    Tbh the mobile industry is long overdue for some competitive upgrades anyway. A lot of their underlying functionality has fallen far behind desktop OSs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    It’s too bad that the software and hardware are not wholly independent. As for Google pulling that kind of nonsense, I wouldn’t put it past them. They are as sketchy as sketchy gets. But this seems isolated and out of the prying hands/eyes of Google (hopefully).

  • source
  • parent