Nuclear is the best btw.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

The comment you’re responding to literally does not mention FF.

Does it need to? That's the alternative we're talking about, whether it's mentioned specifically or not.

Wind and solar are great and have become so good in the past decade that they're more cost effective than everything else, but they still aren't applicable everywhere, most often due to real estate requirements. Nuclear reactors are bulky too, but nothing compared to the amount of space you need for solar arrays or wind turbines to generate an equivalent amount of electricity. For the places where wind and solar can't fit, it's fossil fuels or nuclear.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    That's the alternative you're talking about. Straw men are such mark-ass bitches, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    What alternative do you propose?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments