17
Birth rate and hedonism?
(lemmy.ml)
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
“falling birth rates = bad” is often said with a hint of "great replacement theory" hidden away in the person saying it.
On the other side of that is nations like south korea where it is actually really bad. South Korea has terminal case of low birth rate. By 2045 there will be 60 people over 65 for every 100 working age people. The death to birth ratio is projected to be like 3:1. This is baked in at this point, it is too late to do anything. They could import a bunch of workers but they need like 2% of the population every year over the next 20 years to avoid demographic collapse. They couldn't assimilate them fast enough to avoid a "Ship of Theseisnt" situation.
Where things go after 2045 is anyone's guess but my guess is Korea will probably be reunified because capitalism isn't sexy enough.