Work smarter, not rule
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 5 months ago* (4 children)

You're referring to the reverse mpemba effect? The mpemba effect is already controversial, and the reverse effect is just theoretical from what i understand, being either too weak to be measured or just not real

It also does not require the water to have been boiled prior, and if the water is frozen it would be slower than liquid water regardless

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    No, I'm referring to the tceffe abmepm. The water molecules "remember what it "felt like"" to be boiling so they are faster to return to that state the second time. It is really real.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child)

    That can't be true, water molecules are really tiny you know, and therefore their brains are naturally also really tiny,
    and we all know that what little brainpower and memory they have is focused on keeping track of how many times that particular water molecule has been part of someones urine

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    Intelligence isn't directly correlated with brain size, but rather the size of the brain relative to the size of the thing it's in. For all we know, water is 99% brain, making it far more intelligent than humans.

  • source
  • parent