536
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
536 points (99.3% liked)
Mildly Interesting
27328 readers
1026 users here now
This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.
This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?
Just post some stuff and don't spam.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
With my attention span, it would take me at least three three times as long to read the Microsoft TOS.
Who did they have time this shit? A speed reader?
I don't consider myself a fast reader and I can read 15k words in under an hour, even under half an hour, depending on what it is. eg an engaging short story I can zoom through if I'm hooked and want to keep reading it. Some boring T&S would take me a lot longer. Word count is much less relevant than content when it comes to determining reading time.
Idk too many people who can read the art of war in under an hour, either :p
They base the reading time by assuming someone reads 240 words per minute (stated near the top of the infograph, on the right.)
My guess is they didn't actually time somebody reading the terms and conditions, but rather they took the total word count and divided it by 240.
I wondered where they got the number from, too. I found a page discussing a meta analysis of English reading speeds that concluded that for silent reading, people commonly read 238 words per minute. The infographic probably took that average and rounded it up to 240.
Though considering the jargon and opacity of most "terms and conditions," I imagine the reality to be that most people take longer to read through it than if they were reading something for pleasure.