Doesn't really sound like "absolute revisionism" to me. Was there a single thing I said that was factually inaccurate, or are you just throwing the term around meaninglessly?

The only point I see is about Germany having a coalition system, but I was referring to a presidential election, not a parliamentary one.

Since the Nazis did not have a majority, theoretically, a coalition could have been formed that did not include them. But, as you said, conservatives were more willing to work with Nazis than leftists. Which says to me, and this might be "absolute revisionism" again, that if you're trying to stop fascists electorally, you should at least make sure that the person you're electing isn't just going to promote and work with the exact people you're trying to stop.

I might mention here that the Democrats campaigned alongside Dick Cheney while refusing to allow even purely symbolic things like allowing a Palestinian speaker at their convention.

Absolute revisionism, please educate yourself.

There's no shame in being ignorant, it's the mix of ignorance and extreme arrogance that you're right that make people like you so supremely loathsome