you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 20 points 5 months ago (8 children)

It is just comparing against well-known public texts available to AI crawlers.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (7 children)

    Yeah, it seems like it's actually working as intended?

    EDIT: peoples hate boner for AI at full display. Calm down, motherfuckers

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    It isn't saying "I recognize this text", it is saying "this text is AI generated".

    And then it's offering a service to rewrite it, with ai, so that it can't be recognized as ai.

    It's doing SOMETHING, for sure. I just don't think what it's doing results in accurate results for what it claims to measure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    That's how they get you. You'll pay money to get AI to make it appear human. Then another AI will detect the AI writing and offer to change it for a fee. They are all in on it. This keeps going until society collapses... Or people stop using fake AI detectors.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -12 points 5 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 19 points 5 months ago

    I mean.... No? We had plagiarism checkers long before these AI checkers, and the latter very specifically advertises that it's meant to detect if an LLM generated the text, not whether it's original text. Completely different tools with different purposes.

  • source
  • parent