144

a recent attempt to rewrite SQLite in Rust using AI. "It passed all the unit tests, the shape of the code looks right," he said. It's 3.7x more lines of code that performs 2,000 times worse than the actual SQLite. Two thousand times worse for a database is a non-viable product. It's a dumpster fire. Throw it away. All that money you spent on it is worthless."

Insurers, he said, are already lobbying state-level insurance regulators to win a carve-out in business insurance liability policies so they are not obligated to cover AI-related workflows. "That kills the whole system," Deeks said. Smiley added: "The question here is if it's all so great, why are the insurance underwriters going to great lengths to prohibit coverage for these things? They're generally pretty good at risk profiling."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] iinavpov@mastodon.online 2 points 1 month ago

@artifex
It's even worse than that: profilers rub your code 20-100 tubes slower, which, if performance is OKish to begin with is workable. 2000x too slow? Can't even profile!

this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
144 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

2534 readers
34 users here now

Tech related news and discussion. Link to anything, it doesn't need to be a news article.

Let's keep the politics and business side of things to a minimum.

Rules

No memes

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS