▲ 265 ▼ Age checks creep into Linux as systemd gets a DOB field (www.theregister.com) submitted 5 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world 106 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago (1 child) Why would it need to know your real name? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago (1 child) It doesn't. It just needs some name to display on the welcome screen and doesn't know what else to call it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 5 months ago (1 child) Welcome screen? Systemd doesn’t have a welcome screen. And even if it did, why would it need anything other than username? Why does it need a field for location and email? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago (1 child) Because back in the 60s and 70s, people wanted to know whose print jobs were running and where the printed documents should be delivered. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 5 months ago (1 child) So over 40 years before systemd was initially released? I’m hearing a whole lot of mental gymnastics from both of y’all to explain away the “okay” fields while demonizing the (optional) “evil” fields. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) What are you getting at me for? You asked a question and I answered. I don't care about any new gecos fields because they're optional. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) <.< Your answer makes no sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) Why does it need a field for location and email? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gecos_field#Format https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_linux/4/html/introduction_to_system_administration/s2-acctsgrps-files#ftn.idm140081194521120 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago* My point was that adding another optional field asking for DOB is just as “scary” as the optional fields asking for real name and location. It doesn’t need them, which was what the other user was alluding to. ETA: I’m using “scary” but I realize it’s being demonized in a number of ways, such as “evil” or “giving an inch” or “giving into pressure” or “eroding privacy”, etc. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago (1 child) It doesn't. It just needs some name to display on the welcome screen and doesn't know what else to call it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 5 months ago (1 child) Welcome screen? Systemd doesn’t have a welcome screen. And even if it did, why would it need anything other than username? Why does it need a field for location and email? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago (1 child) Because back in the 60s and 70s, people wanted to know whose print jobs were running and where the printed documents should be delivered. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 5 months ago (1 child) So over 40 years before systemd was initially released? I’m hearing a whole lot of mental gymnastics from both of y’all to explain away the “okay” fields while demonizing the (optional) “evil” fields. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) What are you getting at me for? You asked a question and I answered. I don't care about any new gecos fields because they're optional. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) <.< Your answer makes no sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) Why does it need a field for location and email? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gecos_field#Format https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_linux/4/html/introduction_to_system_administration/s2-acctsgrps-files#ftn.idm140081194521120 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago* My point was that adding another optional field asking for DOB is just as “scary” as the optional fields asking for real name and location. It doesn’t need them, which was what the other user was alluding to. ETA: I’m using “scary” but I realize it’s being demonized in a number of ways, such as “evil” or “giving an inch” or “giving into pressure” or “eroding privacy”, etc. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 5 months ago (1 child) Welcome screen? Systemd doesn’t have a welcome screen. And even if it did, why would it need anything other than username? Why does it need a field for location and email? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago (1 child) Because back in the 60s and 70s, people wanted to know whose print jobs were running and where the printed documents should be delivered. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 5 months ago (1 child) So over 40 years before systemd was initially released? I’m hearing a whole lot of mental gymnastics from both of y’all to explain away the “okay” fields while demonizing the (optional) “evil” fields. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) What are you getting at me for? You asked a question and I answered. I don't care about any new gecos fields because they're optional. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) <.< Your answer makes no sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) Why does it need a field for location and email? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gecos_field#Format https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_linux/4/html/introduction_to_system_administration/s2-acctsgrps-files#ftn.idm140081194521120 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago* My point was that adding another optional field asking for DOB is just as “scary” as the optional fields asking for real name and location. It doesn’t need them, which was what the other user was alluding to. ETA: I’m using “scary” but I realize it’s being demonized in a number of ways, such as “evil” or “giving an inch” or “giving into pressure” or “eroding privacy”, etc. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago (1 child) Because back in the 60s and 70s, people wanted to know whose print jobs were running and where the printed documents should be delivered. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 5 months ago (1 child) So over 40 years before systemd was initially released? I’m hearing a whole lot of mental gymnastics from both of y’all to explain away the “okay” fields while demonizing the (optional) “evil” fields. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) What are you getting at me for? You asked a question and I answered. I don't care about any new gecos fields because they're optional. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) <.< Your answer makes no sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) Why does it need a field for location and email? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gecos_field#Format https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_linux/4/html/introduction_to_system_administration/s2-acctsgrps-files#ftn.idm140081194521120 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago* My point was that adding another optional field asking for DOB is just as “scary” as the optional fields asking for real name and location. It doesn’t need them, which was what the other user was alluding to. ETA: I’m using “scary” but I realize it’s being demonized in a number of ways, such as “evil” or “giving an inch” or “giving into pressure” or “eroding privacy”, etc. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 5 months ago (1 child) So over 40 years before systemd was initially released? I’m hearing a whole lot of mental gymnastics from both of y’all to explain away the “okay” fields while demonizing the (optional) “evil” fields. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) What are you getting at me for? You asked a question and I answered. I don't care about any new gecos fields because they're optional. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) <.< Your answer makes no sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) Why does it need a field for location and email? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gecos_field#Format https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_linux/4/html/introduction_to_system_administration/s2-acctsgrps-files#ftn.idm140081194521120 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago* My point was that adding another optional field asking for DOB is just as “scary” as the optional fields asking for real name and location. It doesn’t need them, which was what the other user was alluding to. ETA: I’m using “scary” but I realize it’s being demonized in a number of ways, such as “evil” or “giving an inch” or “giving into pressure” or “eroding privacy”, etc. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) What are you getting at me for? You asked a question and I answered. I don't care about any new gecos fields because they're optional. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) <.< Your answer makes no sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) Why does it need a field for location and email? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gecos_field#Format https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_linux/4/html/introduction_to_system_administration/s2-acctsgrps-files#ftn.idm140081194521120 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago* My point was that adding another optional field asking for DOB is just as “scary” as the optional fields asking for real name and location. It doesn’t need them, which was what the other user was alluding to. ETA: I’m using “scary” but I realize it’s being demonized in a number of ways, such as “evil” or “giving an inch” or “giving into pressure” or “eroding privacy”, etc. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) <.< Your answer makes no sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) Why does it need a field for location and email? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gecos_field#Format https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_linux/4/html/introduction_to_system_administration/s2-acctsgrps-files#ftn.idm140081194521120 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago* My point was that adding another optional field asking for DOB is just as “scary” as the optional fields asking for real name and location. It doesn’t need them, which was what the other user was alluding to. ETA: I’m using “scary” but I realize it’s being demonized in a number of ways, such as “evil” or “giving an inch” or “giving into pressure” or “eroding privacy”, etc. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) Why does it need a field for location and email? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gecos_field#Format https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_linux/4/html/introduction_to_system_administration/s2-acctsgrps-files#ftn.idm140081194521120 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago* My point was that adding another optional field asking for DOB is just as “scary” as the optional fields asking for real name and location. It doesn’t need them, which was what the other user was alluding to. ETA: I’m using “scary” but I realize it’s being demonized in a number of ways, such as “evil” or “giving an inch” or “giving into pressure” or “eroding privacy”, etc. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 5 months ago* My point was that adding another optional field asking for DOB is just as “scary” as the optional fields asking for real name and location. It doesn’t need them, which was what the other user was alluding to. ETA: I’m using “scary” but I realize it’s being demonized in a number of ways, such as “evil” or “giving an inch” or “giving into pressure” or “eroding privacy”, etc. permalink fedilink source parent