you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 117 points 5 months ago (47 children)

Hate to say it but systemd, the init system of most Linux distros, already has PRs with maintainer backing to implement DoB recording.

Some people can't kneel fast enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 52 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 5 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 68 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    The self-important creator of Systemd has personally blocked that PR, if I'm hearing correctly, which would suggest he or his employer Microsoft is all in on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

    It's an optional field in the userdb JSON object. It's not a policy engine, not an API for apps. We just define the field, so that it's standardized iff people want to store the date there, but it's entirely optional.

    "I'm not picking a side" and "this future proofs standardization" is of little comfort, that is seriously suspect. I ought to look to alternatives to SystemD(odge the issue failed).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago

    Maybe this'll take the shine off that wunderkinder mess and people will finally be free to choose something more reliable. I love how RH pushed this beta software so hard and my reboots are now just shite -- unreliable and occasionally ridiculously delayed.

    I'll be glad to see the back of that metastatic shitball.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    DoB recording, and ID age verification, are two different things though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (42 replies)