▲ 598 ▼ A.I.’s un-learning problem: Researchers say it’s virtually impossible to make an A.I. model ‘forget’ the things it learns from private user data (finance.yahoo.com) submitted 3 years ago by assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 206 comments fedilink hide all child comments I'm rather curious to see how the EU's privacy laws are going to handle this. (Original article is from Fortune, but Yahoo Finance doesn't have a paywall)
[–] Asymptote@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 years ago (3 children) "removing a specific feature from a compiled binary executable" That's how patches used to be 😆 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] spikespaz@programming.dev 2 points 3 years ago (2 children) Patches today patch source code. The kind of binary patching you talk about only works with deterministic builds, which sadly there's not enough of out there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Asymptote@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 years ago Lemme just say I'm old permalink fedilink source parent [–] __dev@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago I don't see how that's related at all. Having deterministic builds only matters if you're building a binary from source, if you're working with some distributed binary you'll be applying the patch to identical binaries anyway. And if a new binary is distributed, that's going to be because something in the source was changed; deterministic builds will still give you a different binary if the source changes. Binary patching is still common, both for getting around DRM and for software updates. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] spikespaz@programming.dev 2 points 3 years ago (2 children) Patches today patch source code. The kind of binary patching you talk about only works with deterministic builds, which sadly there's not enough of out there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Asymptote@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 years ago Lemme just say I'm old permalink fedilink source parent [–] __dev@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago I don't see how that's related at all. Having deterministic builds only matters if you're building a binary from source, if you're working with some distributed binary you'll be applying the patch to identical binaries anyway. And if a new binary is distributed, that's going to be because something in the source was changed; deterministic builds will still give you a different binary if the source changes. Binary patching is still common, both for getting around DRM and for software updates. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Asymptote@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 years ago Lemme just say I'm old permalink fedilink source parent
[–] __dev@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago I don't see how that's related at all. Having deterministic builds only matters if you're building a binary from source, if you're working with some distributed binary you'll be applying the patch to identical binaries anyway. And if a new binary is distributed, that's going to be because something in the source was changed; deterministic builds will still give you a different binary if the source changes. Binary patching is still common, both for getting around DRM and for software updates. permalink fedilink source parent