This thought came to me in the shower today. Open source checks most of the boxes. It is a collaborative, worker owned (develloper-owned) project, that tries to flatten hierarchy. Especially if you look at something like Debian ), which really tries to have a bottom-up structure.
Of course, there are exceptions, considering there are a lot of corporate open-source projects, that are not democratically maintained and clearly only serve the interest of the company, who created it (like chromium for example).
So I am mainly talking about community-oriented FOSS projects here.
And if you were to agree with my statement, would you say that developing FOSS software is advancing the goals of the anarchist / communist project, because it is laying the groundwork infrastructure needed for a new kind of economy and society?
Thought this could be an interesting discussion!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

You obviously want WTFPL instead of MIT for that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

    Yeah that's even better

    But I believe in a world where no license would be equal to that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment