The Apple MacBook Neo's $599 starting price is a "shock" to the Windows PC industry, according to an Asus executive.

Hsu said he believes all the PC players—including Microsoft, Intel, and AMD—take the MacBook Neo threat seriously. "In fact, in the entire PC ecosystem, there have been a lot of discussions about how to compete with this product," he added, given that rumors about the MacBook Neo have been making the rounds for at least a year.

Despite the competitive threat, Hsu argued that the MacBook Neo could have limited appeal. He pointed to the laptop's 8GB of "unified memory," or what amounts to its RAM, and how customers can't upgrade it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 40 points 6 months ago (10 children)

Lemmings that focus on the RAM spec are telling on themselves. 256gb storage is the real travesty here.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 6 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 28 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    If you like to actually do your computing locally, it sucks. If you're using it for web browsing, the specs are great.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I do all my computing locally.

    I doubt I have a system using more than 256GB on a system disk. There's 14 running in the house.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    It is not a lot, but it is not that hard to extend storage. For example with an external SSD/HDD or a NAS.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago* (3 children)

    Even if tethering any portable device to an external drive wasn’t wildly inconvenient, you would be giving up your only usb port on this thing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    Still doable, but you can't have external RAM. Hence, lack of RAM is a bigger issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    More than 8GB of RAM is unnecessary, and getting around that limitation does not require any action by the user.

    Setting up a NAS + tailscale solution is doable but not worth the hassle for whatever niche use-case that would resolve.

  • source
  • parent