▲ 275 ▼ Buying a new car has become unaffordable for a growing number of Americans. The auto industry is worried (www.nytimes.com) submitted 5 months ago* by Valnao@sh.itjust.works to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world 139 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Lund3@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago (3 children) 2014?? My Nissan Primera from 96 is still running fine. Check with a mechanic if its possible to resurrect your car. It should hold for longer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] 123@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago Hyundai's and kias are known for costing more in labor and parts to repair (while taking a chance it might not work out) than a comparable car in working order. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheLastOfHisName@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Truthfully, it's not worth it. It had an engine replacement a few years ago, and lately, I'm racking up repair bills faster than I can pay them off. permalink fedilink source parent [–] rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 5 months ago* Hyundai and Kia have multiple engines through the 2010's that are prone to varying degrees of death from sudden to less-so-but-still-immediate. (there's been lawsuits, extended warranties, etc.) And that's before you include the whole easy-theft design flaw increasing insurance and vandalism risk from the same time period. It's a shame since it really kicked off their "solid value car with some sneaky design flaw that'll kill it/burn it/strand you/cost a lot of money later/etc." trend that continues to this day - even in their electric models. If it's a second car and exclusively driven locally then you can be fine with one especially since you'll have lots of cheap parts at junkyards for a while to come. Especially if the engine's been replaced already under the lawsuit but multiple replacement engines isn't unheard of. And you'll want to change oil every 3-4k miles and watch the oil level like a hawk. Not saying they haven't made a solid individual vehicle nor are all lawsuit vehicles about to die but it's not really great having that Sword of Damocles dangling to save a buck. (of course it depends on how many bucks are involved) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 123@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago Hyundai's and kias are known for costing more in labor and parts to repair (while taking a chance it might not work out) than a comparable car in working order. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheLastOfHisName@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Truthfully, it's not worth it. It had an engine replacement a few years ago, and lately, I'm racking up repair bills faster than I can pay them off. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 5 months ago* Hyundai and Kia have multiple engines through the 2010's that are prone to varying degrees of death from sudden to less-so-but-still-immediate. (there's been lawsuits, extended warranties, etc.) And that's before you include the whole easy-theft design flaw increasing insurance and vandalism risk from the same time period. It's a shame since it really kicked off their "solid value car with some sneaky design flaw that'll kill it/burn it/strand you/cost a lot of money later/etc." trend that continues to this day - even in their electric models. If it's a second car and exclusively driven locally then you can be fine with one especially since you'll have lots of cheap parts at junkyards for a while to come. Especially if the engine's been replaced already under the lawsuit but multiple replacement engines isn't unheard of. And you'll want to change oil every 3-4k miles and watch the oil level like a hawk. Not saying they haven't made a solid individual vehicle nor are all lawsuit vehicles about to die but it's not really great having that Sword of Damocles dangling to save a buck. (of course it depends on how many bucks are involved) permalink fedilink source parent