1224
Claude Code deletes developers' production setup, including its database and snapshots — 2.5 years of records were nuked in an instant (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 6 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
289 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 6 months ago (4 children)

With some of the cloud providers, their built in backups are linked to the resource. So even if you have super duper geo-zone redundant backups for years, they still get nuked if you drop the server.

It's always felt a bit stupid, but the backups can still normally be restored by support.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (3 children)

    That's because these are not backups. With backups you still have your data even if the cloud provider has gone away.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    They are backups, you potentially get copy's of the data in multiple locations across continents.

    BUT I agree, you are relying on them entirely for it. Lots of vendor tie in stuff in the industry unfortunately.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

    Is everyone in commercial software development finally saying, "Fuck it, we'll run the shit ourselves"?

    I'm an infrastructure and devops noob here; take my words with a grain of salt.

    I need GPU clusters with ECC VRAM for research and found it's cheaper to just have my own high-ish performance compute in my own office I paid for once than pay AWS/Azure/GCS/etc forever or at least everytime I want to train a custom DNN model. Sometimes I use Linode but it's for monitoring. But I can run shit at will and I have data sovereignty.

    Has the paradigm shifted back to developing and serving things in-house now that big tech vendor-lock/tie-ins have so many dark patterns that scalability isn't cost-effective with them? Or is it just my own pipe dream?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    If you are going to use it enough to pay for it sure. But that's always been the case.

    The main benefits of cloud are it's ability to scale quickly, it's ability to provide geographic reach and the conversation of capex to opex.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent