298
Pam Bondi subpoenaed by US House in Jeffrey Epstein investigation
(www.theguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
298 points (99.3% liked)
The Trump-Epstein Files™
1191 readers
16 users here now
We keep track of the release of the files, but also to explore what’s already available, and why – with enough exposure – this could bring the man down, and who knows even his regime or the empire.
Want to start digging yourself? Check out our sticky post
Our Rules
(Subject to Change)
- #1 Be kind: keep it civil and amicable. The enemy is not in this community but in Palaces, The White House and penthouses.
- #2 Trigger Warnings: required. Mark posts which may be triggering to read or see for victims of sexual abuse with "[TW]" in front of your post title. If you're posting an image or video with explicit thumbnail, you will have to set the entire post as NSFW AND include the TW.
- #3 Cite sources: preferably direct link to the article/pdf and or an archive link in case there is a paywalled. In the article find a relevant few paragraphs and quote them in your post.
- #4 Post the Bates numbers: when referencing evidence (even if it is mentioned in an article), please post
- the Bates number of the file you’re referring to (EFTA00000000)
- a link to the original source
- a link to a mirror of the file in case DOJ pulls the file.
- #5 include key paragraphs: when posting articles, include a few key paragraphs of the article (not the entire article)
- #6 avoid links to social media as sources. Links to twitter must use xcancel.com.
Our Justice System
- First offence: warning + 2 day ban
- Second offence: 7 day ban
- Third offence: permanent ban from community
- Creating multiple accounts to interact with this community: permanent ban for all accounts in community + report to your instance admin.
This community is run by volunteers so please don't test the justice system, as with all justice systems it is critically underfunded.
founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
I think you lost me there. No charges have been brought, or even suggested. Nor will they be, because Pam Bondi heads the very organization that would bring them: she'd have to be kicked out of the AG role first.
The subpoena is simply for Bondi to be forced to testify under oath for the House Oversight Committee, as opposed to just showing up. Whether that makes any difference or not is up to whatever personal respect she may still have for the law, and I'm not holding my breath.
But what it does do is create a path of personal legal responsibility for whatever filth tumbles out of her mouth under oath. That's not important today, but could be in whatever future moment in time Congress feels like resuming its own co-equal Article I powers and duties in regard to rogue officials. Not a promise, and definitely not charges. Just a caution with potential future bite.