297
Pam Bondi subpoenaed by US House in Jeffrey Epstein investigation
(www.theguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
297 points (99.3% liked)
The Trump-Epstein Files™
1234 readers
134 users here now
We keep track of the release of the files, but also to explore what’s already available, and why – with enough exposure – this could bring the man down, and who knows even his regime or the empire.
Want to start digging yourself? Check out our sticky post
Our Rules
(Subject to Change)
- #1 Be kind: keep it civil and amicable. The enemy is not in this community but in Palaces, The White House and penthouses.
- #2 Trigger Warnings: required. Mark posts which may be triggering to read or see for victims of sexual abuse with "[TW]" in front of your post title. If you're posting an image or video with explicit thumbnail, you will have to set the entire post as NSFW AND include the TW.
- #3 Cite sources: preferably direct link to the article/pdf and or an archive link in case there is a paywalled. In the article find a relevant few paragraphs and quote them in your post.
- #4 Post the Bates numbers: when referencing evidence (even if it is mentioned in an article), please post
- the Bates number of the file you’re referring to (EFTA00000000)
- a link to the original source
- a link to a mirror of the file in case DOJ pulls the file.
- #5 include key paragraphs: when posting articles, include a few key paragraphs of the article (not the entire article)
- #6 avoid links to social media as sources. Links to twitter must use xcancel.com.
Our Justice System
- First offence: warning + 2 day ban
- Second offence: 7 day ban
- Third offence: permanent ban from community
- Creating multiple accounts to interact with this community: permanent ban for all accounts in community + report to your instance admin.
This community is run by volunteers so please don't test the justice system, as with all justice systems it is critically underfunded.
founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
Yea was here for that. Guy I went to HS with, was on duty that night and joined the chase. Didn't fire any shots but was on scene at the time it happened.
He testified truthfully during the trial, and wouldn't you know he had to throw away a 10+ year career because after that all the other cops hated and harassed him.
During that murder, one of the cops jumped up on the hood off the car after it was stopped and unloaded his entire magazine down straight into the people inside.
Protect and serve my ass. And of course heaven forbid if we ever hold law enforcement accountable.
Not so hot take... Regular police should not have guns. Not with less lethal alternatives now which they already carry as well. If guns are necessary, that's for SWAT.
If they don't have their 9mm Universal Problem Solver, they'll have to actually deescalate and work through situations.