▲ 662 ▼ It's not just you — no one is posting on social media anymore (www.businessinsider.com) submitted 3 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world 180 comments fedilink hide all child comments It's not just you — no one is posting on social media anymore::Social media is on the decline. Instagram is all ads. No one's posting on BeReal. TikTok is for influencers. The new place for sharing: group chats.
[+] reddig33@lemmy.world 68 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Demuniac@lemmy.world 25 points 3 years ago Well people turning out to be mostly idiots didn't help permalink fedilink source parent [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 years ago That effort is the reason social media emerged. The Web before them was sufficient, it had human-curated website directories and RSS (though that I began noticing later), and web rings, and in general was fulfilling its purpose. Now, the idea was to centralize everything under Zuck or someone else's control. And from the very beginning it was even more ominous than now, cause people usually knew then that in the Web you should be pseudonymous, except for your personal webpage, and also that what gets out doesn't get back in, and that an account on some site doesn't belong to you. What I'm disgusted with personally is how the transition to social media was spearheaded by clueless illiterate people, and instead of protecting the culture everybody else just decided that they are right and we are wrong. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Demuniac@lemmy.world 25 points 3 years ago Well people turning out to be mostly idiots didn't help permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 years ago That effort is the reason social media emerged. The Web before them was sufficient, it had human-curated website directories and RSS (though that I began noticing later), and web rings, and in general was fulfilling its purpose. Now, the idea was to centralize everything under Zuck or someone else's control. And from the very beginning it was even more ominous than now, cause people usually knew then that in the Web you should be pseudonymous, except for your personal webpage, and also that what gets out doesn't get back in, and that an account on some site doesn't belong to you. What I'm disgusted with personally is how the transition to social media was spearheaded by clueless illiterate people, and instead of protecting the culture everybody else just decided that they are right and we are wrong. permalink fedilink source parent