you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (13 children)
  • [โ€“] 9 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    No it doesn't include a normal processing plugin which has been used on 90% of your favourite music

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)
  • [โ€“] 3 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    If it is a studio recording of music with vocals since 1980-90, I would put money on there being some correction on the vocals. If it is a studio recording of music with vocals since 2000, i would put money on there being some use of autotune or melodyne or a similar pitch correction software/hardware.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    I wish this fucking Cher Song would have never happend. I hate autotune with a passion, especially when it's at 100% and sounds like a drunk robot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)
  • [โ€“] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I wonder if there is a mix up in our minds between the use of auto-tune to "correct" a voice track and the voluntary use of extreme auto-tune options to create music out of an otherwise bland track (like daft-punk used to do...).

    I'm not a musical artist so I don't know exactly how far auto-tune goes or if you can classify all voice mods as auto-tuning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment