There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 3 years ago (4 children)

Because the majority of people not having babies don't plan to have babies, and the majority of people who want babies still manage to have them, though it might take more attempts than it used to, or IVF assistance. The desire and cultural influences are much bigger factors at the moment on birth rate than endocrine disruptors.

(Though they're probably responsible for a bunch of other stuff, like the obesity epidemic)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (3 children)

    Are you going off sources that people who want them end up having them? I know personally at least 4 families that miscarried a ton and couldn't have more babies even though they wanted to. They may have at least had one, but never had the 2-4 kids they wanted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (2 children)

    Sorry to hear that. What were their age ranges? It's well known that age is the biggest influence in miscarriage chance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I'm sure there are more sources, I"m just lazy today.

    Studies show that EDCs can cause declines in sperm count and quality. It’s suggested that high levels of these chemicals can cause impaired female reproduction or an increased chance of miscarriage. While debatable, some research shows that endocrine disruptors can cause higher chances of developing endometriosis in females.

    https://www.webmd.com/a-to-z-guides/what-to-know-about-endocrine-disruptors

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment