you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (7 children)

For example South Australia - no coal since 2016, no nuclear ever, runs mostly on a mix of renewables - solar and wind with batteries and transient gas for in-fill.

Edit: thanks to whoever downvoted my verified statement of fact (see below)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

    So I looked in the document and it agrees with my point. The most recent stats for South Australia are 8977 GWh of renewable energy and 5717 GWh non-renewable gas energy. You'll note the gas use is dropping pretty rapidly as they put more renewables on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Ok, so from your point of view 40% fossil fuels is still doing fine? I interpreted your original comment to mean they were doing 100% or close to it in renewables. Then I misunderstood.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)