you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 8 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    I'd say the vehicle not continuing to drive with a traffic cone on its hood is the exact way it should operate.

    But putting a cone on its hood should be a crime. Vandalism or obstruction of some flavor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    But putting a cone on its hood should be a crime.

    What a wild take. "Ah yes, we should be protecting capital at all costs."

    A traffic cone is not damaging the property, or hurting anyone. It just damages their bottom line a little bit.

    It's not even like the car is personal property, someone's only mode of transportation. And if it were, it wouldn't matter, because a human can just remove a cone.

    I find it hilarious and unhinged that people will genuinely suggest that something as minor as placing a traffic cone on the hood of a robotaxi should be criminalized.

  • source
  • parent