you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 6 months ago (1 child)

This isn’t a rant about AI.

I feared thus would be about AI, but... this might actually be interesting! I'm glad I started reading.

This time is different [...] Previous technology shifts were “learn the new thing, apply existing skills.” AI isn’t that.

Well f*ck you and give me back the time I wasted on that article.

Guys, can we add a rule that all posts that deal with using LLM bots to code must be marked? I am sick of this topic.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Guys, can we add a rule that all posts that deal with using LLM bots to code must be marked? I am sick of this topic.

    How would you like them to be marked? AFAIK Lemmy doesn't support post tags

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

    Could put [AI Subject] in the title.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Actual technical articles about LLM/diffusion would be interesting to read (I think?)... maybe something like [vibecoding]?

    Actually, let's make that generic and use [futurology], so that it may apply regardless of whether the incumbent revolution/menace is LLMs, low code tools, or stack overflow.

  • source
  • parent