you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child)

That'll do it. The work might be impressive, but why care about a project that has one purely spite-driven goal that makes no technical or social sense?

It uses real init systems

What a completely childish tagline. Even if there was any merit to all the systemd hate, calling it “not a real init system” is absurd.

They stopped supporting GNOME based desktops and treat that in the most “sour grapes” way imaginable …

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    I've seen systemd developers themselves say it's not an init system [it's more].

    And it's more a matter of love, than "spite", to support init-freedom.

    GNOME stopped supporting other init systems.

  • source
  • parent