▲ 370 ▼ Its not looking good.. (thelemmy.club) submitted 7 months ago by EngineX@lemmy.zip to c/memes@lemmy.ml 344 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Wakmrow@hexbear.net 37 points 7 months ago (4 children) Bad for who permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FunkyStuff@lemmy.ml 34 points 7 months ago* (3 children) It is a pretty bad deal for Western workers that our economies have deindustrialized. But that's not China's fault, that's our ruling classes' fault. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Wakmrow@hexbear.net 5 points 7 months ago (2 children) Deindustrialization itself isn't really bad. It's a neutral thing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FunkyStuff@lemmy.ml 18 points 7 months ago Yeah, kind of, but under a capitalist system where workers can't reap the benefits of automation and much labor is still performed in the imperial periphery it is negative. permalink fedilink source parent [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 13 points 7 months ago I would argue that it is in fact bad because it's a threat to national security and sovereignty. The Europeans are now finding out that they're unable to produce things domestically that their people need, and have become entirely reliant on US energy exports and military protection. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FunkyStuff@lemmy.ml 34 points 7 months ago* (3 children) It is a pretty bad deal for Western workers that our economies have deindustrialized. But that's not China's fault, that's our ruling classes' fault. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Wakmrow@hexbear.net 5 points 7 months ago (2 children) Deindustrialization itself isn't really bad. It's a neutral thing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FunkyStuff@lemmy.ml 18 points 7 months ago Yeah, kind of, but under a capitalist system where workers can't reap the benefits of automation and much labor is still performed in the imperial periphery it is negative. permalink fedilink source parent [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 13 points 7 months ago I would argue that it is in fact bad because it's a threat to national security and sovereignty. The Europeans are now finding out that they're unable to produce things domestically that their people need, and have become entirely reliant on US energy exports and military protection. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Wakmrow@hexbear.net 5 points 7 months ago (2 children) Deindustrialization itself isn't really bad. It's a neutral thing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FunkyStuff@lemmy.ml 18 points 7 months ago Yeah, kind of, but under a capitalist system where workers can't reap the benefits of automation and much labor is still performed in the imperial periphery it is negative. permalink fedilink source parent [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 13 points 7 months ago I would argue that it is in fact bad because it's a threat to national security and sovereignty. The Europeans are now finding out that they're unable to produce things domestically that their people need, and have become entirely reliant on US energy exports and military protection. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FunkyStuff@lemmy.ml 18 points 7 months ago Yeah, kind of, but under a capitalist system where workers can't reap the benefits of automation and much labor is still performed in the imperial periphery it is negative. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 13 points 7 months ago I would argue that it is in fact bad because it's a threat to national security and sovereignty. The Europeans are now finding out that they're unable to produce things domestically that their people need, and have become entirely reliant on US energy exports and military protection. permalink fedilink source parent