▲ 362 ▼ who did that?! (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago by hairinmybellybutt@lemmy.world [M] to c/climatememes@lemmy.world 98 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] kaj@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago (3 children) Regulations backed by whom? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) What do you mean? Government. This is the only real chance given the scale and timeliness of the change needed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kaj@lemmy.world -3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yes, but a democratically elected government generally won't pass policy that isn't endorsed by many of its constituents. Policy that eg universally increases the cost of meat by placing strict limits on farmers would not do well without a significant shift in voter opinion and reduction in funding of animal agriculture lobby funding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago Yup. I didn't say it was very likely, just that of all the nigh-insurmountable obstacles, that one seems the most realistic. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) What do you mean? Government. This is the only real chance given the scale and timeliness of the change needed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kaj@lemmy.world -3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yes, but a democratically elected government generally won't pass policy that isn't endorsed by many of its constituents. Policy that eg universally increases the cost of meat by placing strict limits on farmers would not do well without a significant shift in voter opinion and reduction in funding of animal agriculture lobby funding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago Yup. I didn't say it was very likely, just that of all the nigh-insurmountable obstacles, that one seems the most realistic. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kaj@lemmy.world -3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yes, but a democratically elected government generally won't pass policy that isn't endorsed by many of its constituents. Policy that eg universally increases the cost of meat by placing strict limits on farmers would not do well without a significant shift in voter opinion and reduction in funding of animal agriculture lobby funding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago Yup. I didn't say it was very likely, just that of all the nigh-insurmountable obstacles, that one seems the most realistic. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago Yup. I didn't say it was very likely, just that of all the nigh-insurmountable obstacles, that one seems the most realistic. permalink fedilink source parent
