I still disagree with that notion. That's not normal human behavior. You're making it sound as if people can only process the top immediate threat and disregard the rest. But that's not humans work. Humans are able to have and process multiple threats at once. If what you're saying is true then nobody would care about what's going on in Ukraine, Iran, or Gaza because these conflicts are so far away... yet so many people do even though they face problems in their home countries that are much closer, more imminent, and have greater impact on their daily lives... like inflation or climate change or increased government tyranny.

The point is that it doesn't make sense from a logical point of view to reject a shitty government for being authoritarian and then disregard another shitty government that's also authoritarian, if not more so. A rational person does process both as being threats for similar reasons. That's a consistent and principled take. The one and only reason why one would cozy up to one over the other is because of ignorance, which is precisely what I think is going on here.