▲ 1341 ▼ Microsoft CEO warns that we must 'do something useful' with AI or they'll lose 'social permission' to burn electricity on it (www.pcgamer.com) submitted 7 months ago by throws_lemy@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 354 comments fedilink hide all child comments Workers should learn AI skills and companies should use it because it's a "cognitive amplifier," claims Satya Nadella. in other words please help us, use our AI
[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 213 points 7 months ago (9 children) So...he has something USELESS and he wants everybody to FIND a use for it before HE goes broke? I'll get right on it. permalink fedilink source hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] jafra@slrpnk.net 13 points 7 months ago Nice paraphrasing! permalink fedilink source parent [–] glimse@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (5 children) I was expecting something much worse but to me it deels like he's saying "we, the people working on this stuff, need to find real use cases that actually justifies the expense" which is.....pretty reasonable Not defending him or Microsoft at all here but it sounds like normal business shit, not a CEO begging users to like their product permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (4 children) I mean, it would be a lot more reasonable if the entire tech industry hadn't gone absolutely 100% all-in on investing billions and billions of dollars into the technology before realizing that they didn't have any use cases to justify that investment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] glimse@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (3 children) Oh you don't have to convince me it was a mistake, his comment just wasn't what it's being made out to be. "Find a use for it or we're fucked" is a lot different than "please use our product or we're fucked" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (2 children) Idk I don't really see much of a distinction really permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] glimse@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 child) I dunno, there's a pretty big distinction. "Please use our shitty thing" vs "Please make our shitty thing better so people want to use it" It's placing "blame" on the industry leaders for failing to make something useful permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] msage@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago But HE is the industry leader. It's not like it wasn't him that sunk every successful product they still had in the last couple of years. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 child) It‘s insane how he says „we“ not as in „we at Microsoft“ but as in „Me, I and myself as the sole representative of the world economy say: Find use cases for my utterly destructive slop machine… or else!“ Tech CEOs have all gone mad by protagonist syndrome. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago Well, he is the "money man". He doesn't DO any of the work himself, he "buys" workers. He has NO skill, NO knowledge, NO training, NO license. Just money. All you need is money. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (5 children) I was expecting something much worse but to me it deels like he's saying "we, the people working on this stuff, need to find real use cases that actually justifies the expense" which is.....pretty reasonable Not defending him or Microsoft at all here but it sounds like normal business shit, not a CEO begging users to like their product permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (4 children) I mean, it would be a lot more reasonable if the entire tech industry hadn't gone absolutely 100% all-in on investing billions and billions of dollars into the technology before realizing that they didn't have any use cases to justify that investment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] glimse@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (3 children) Oh you don't have to convince me it was a mistake, his comment just wasn't what it's being made out to be. "Find a use for it or we're fucked" is a lot different than "please use our product or we're fucked" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (2 children) Idk I don't really see much of a distinction really permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] glimse@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 child) I dunno, there's a pretty big distinction. "Please use our shitty thing" vs "Please make our shitty thing better so people want to use it" It's placing "blame" on the industry leaders for failing to make something useful permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] msage@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago But HE is the industry leader. It's not like it wasn't him that sunk every successful product they still had in the last couple of years. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (4 children) I mean, it would be a lot more reasonable if the entire tech industry hadn't gone absolutely 100% all-in on investing billions and billions of dollars into the technology before realizing that they didn't have any use cases to justify that investment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] glimse@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (3 children) Oh you don't have to convince me it was a mistake, his comment just wasn't what it's being made out to be. "Find a use for it or we're fucked" is a lot different than "please use our product or we're fucked" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (2 children) Idk I don't really see much of a distinction really permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] glimse@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 child) I dunno, there's a pretty big distinction. "Please use our shitty thing" vs "Please make our shitty thing better so people want to use it" It's placing "blame" on the industry leaders for failing to make something useful permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] msage@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago But HE is the industry leader. It's not like it wasn't him that sunk every successful product they still had in the last couple of years. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (3 children) Oh you don't have to convince me it was a mistake, his comment just wasn't what it's being made out to be. "Find a use for it or we're fucked" is a lot different than "please use our product or we're fucked" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (2 children) Idk I don't really see much of a distinction really permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] glimse@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 child) I dunno, there's a pretty big distinction. "Please use our shitty thing" vs "Please make our shitty thing better so people want to use it" It's placing "blame" on the industry leaders for failing to make something useful permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] msage@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago But HE is the industry leader. It's not like it wasn't him that sunk every successful product they still had in the last couple of years. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (2 children) Idk I don't really see much of a distinction really permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] glimse@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 child) I dunno, there's a pretty big distinction. "Please use our shitty thing" vs "Please make our shitty thing better so people want to use it" It's placing "blame" on the industry leaders for failing to make something useful permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] msage@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago But HE is the industry leader. It's not like it wasn't him that sunk every successful product they still had in the last couple of years. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 child) I dunno, there's a pretty big distinction. "Please use our shitty thing" vs "Please make our shitty thing better so people want to use it" It's placing "blame" on the industry leaders for failing to make something useful permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] msage@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago But HE is the industry leader. It's not like it wasn't him that sunk every successful product they still had in the last couple of years. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] msage@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago But HE is the industry leader. It's not like it wasn't him that sunk every successful product they still had in the last couple of years. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 child) It‘s insane how he says „we“ not as in „we at Microsoft“ but as in „Me, I and myself as the sole representative of the world economy say: Find use cases for my utterly destructive slop machine… or else!“ Tech CEOs have all gone mad by protagonist syndrome. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago Well, he is the "money man". He doesn't DO any of the work himself, he "buys" workers. He has NO skill, NO knowledge, NO training, NO license. Just money. All you need is money. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago Well, he is the "money man". He doesn't DO any of the work himself, he "buys" workers. He has NO skill, NO knowledge, NO training, NO license. Just money. All you need is money. permalink fedilink source parent